“Empowered Women Without Power” in Mozambique: How a Relatively High Percentage of Women in Parliament Does not Mean More Women-friendly Policies | “Mulheres Empoderadas Sem Poder” em Moçambique
Forthcoming
PDF

Keywords

Empowerment
Gender
Gender-quota
Parliament
Mozambique

How to Cite

Samba, D. D. B. B. (2024). “Empowered Women Without Power” in Mozambique: How a Relatively High Percentage of Women in Parliament Does not Mean More Women-friendly Policies | “Mulheres Empoderadas Sem Poder” em Moçambique. Political Observer | Revista Portuguesa De Ciência Política (Portuguese Journal of Political Science), (22), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.59071/2795-4765.RPCP2024.22/pp.101-116

Abstract

 Although in the twentieth-century women gained more rights, we still far from reaching an egalitarian world where humans are treated equally and have the same opportunities, regardless of their gender. Many African countries have high rates of women in parliament, despite low socio-economic development and deep-rooted patriarchal structures. Based on the case of Mozambique, in this article, we question: does increased female representation in parliament mean more women-friendly policies? Claiming that, where there are no feminist parties, higher rates of women in parliament is due to gender quotas, therefore it will not mean more women-friendly policies. Employing a qualitative methodology consisting of literature review and empirical observation, we confirmed that although women have a considerable high presence in the parliament, they are in a relatively low numerical expression in the main decision-making circles inside the parliament. Similarly, female MPs behave in individualistic behaviour to increase their prospect re-election. 

https://doi.org/10.59071/2795-4765.RPCP2024.22/pp.101-116
PDF

References

Bauman, R. A. (2003). Women and politics in ancient Rome. London: Taylor& Francis e-Library.

Beckwith, K. (2007). Numbers and Newness: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 40(1), 27–49.

Beckwith, K., & Cowell, K. (2007). Sheer Numbers: Critical Representation Thresholds and Women’s Political Representation. 5,(3), 553–565.

Bitar, M., Peillex, J., El Ouadghiri, I., & Obeid, H. (2024). Women’s political empowerment, economic development, and democracy around COVID-19: A cross-country analysis. Applied Economics, 1–19.

Burnet, J.E. (2011). “Women have found respect: gender quotas, symbolic representation and female empowerment in Rwanda”. Pp [303–334]. In Politics&Gender, Vol 7, Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) [United Nation General Assembly’s resolution 34/180 of 18 December 1979].

Dahlerur, D. (2002). “Using quotas and women political leadership”. In International IDEA (2002). Women in parliament beyond numbers. Stockholm: International IDEA.

Inglehart, R. and NORRIS, P. (2003). Rising tide: gender equality and cultural change. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jabeen, M. and AWAN, S.M. (2017). “Gender quotas as an instrument for women’s empowerment in legislatures”. In FWW Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1): 132-142.

Accessed websites

AR (Assembleia da Republica). (2021). Comissao permanente. Available at: https://www.parlamento.mz/index.php/pt/orgaos/comissao-permanentee. Accessed on: 25. Jan.2021.

International Parliament Union. (2020). “Monthly ranking of women in national parliaments”. Available at: https://data.ipu.org/women-ranking?month=10&year=2020. Accessed on: 5. Jan. 2021.

Nhachote, Luis. (2020). PRM: Instrutores engravidam 15 instruendas do curso básico de Matalane. Available at: https://www.moz24h.co.mz/post/prm-instrutores-engravidam-15-instruendas-do-curso-b%C3%A1sico-de-matalane. Accessed on:25.Jan.2021.

Ussufo, Nadia. (2016). Violência doméstica é preocupante em Moçambique. Available at: https://www.dw.com/pt-002/viol%C3%AAncia-dom%C3%A9stica-%C3%A9-preocupante-em-mo%C3%A7ambique/a-36850499. Accessed on: 5.Jan.2021.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Political Observer | Revista Portuguesa de Ciência Política (Portuguese Journal of Political Science)